Comprehensive Beat Down of Global Temperate Data


Sustainable Infrastructure:

Climate Changes and Carbon Dioxide

Temperatures Record ‘Unreliable’, ‘Arbitrarily Adjusted’, And Of ‘Poor Data Quality’

Temperature measurement stations have been installed at various locations across the globe. The number of temperature monitoring stations is decreasing and many areas across the globe do not have any temperature monitoring stations. Consequently, average surface temperature is an unreliable metric for assessing global temperature trends.

Computer models are used to analyze data sets. In science and engineering (and this paper) the term “data” refers to actual physical measurement at a point in time and space. In some temperature data sets, however, computer simulated values have been added in or data may have been arbitrarily adjusted long after the physical measurement was taken. Such practices undermine the credibility of the data set.   Computer generated values are estimates, projections, or simulations and are of a different quality than physical measurements. Physical measurements represent a physical quantity whereas computer simulations represent numerical calculation.

The HADCRU, GISTEMP, and NOAA surface temperature archives rely on the same underlying input data and therefore are not independent data sets. Limitations of the GHCN affect all data sets. Sampling discontinuities, urbanization and land use changes have decreased the quality of GHCN data over time. Differences in data processing methods between research teams do not compensate for poor underlying data quality inherent in the GHCN data. A similar situation exists with historical Sea Surface Temperature (SST) data sets which are derived primarily from the International Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set (ICODADS).

Read More: Engineering Prof. Questions Temperature Record, Models, CO2 Climate Sensitivity

Please like, share, subscribe and comment


Global Cooling is Causing Catastrophic Breeding Failure of Penguins


The real threat to civilization and the environment its global warming, it is global cooling. Life thrives during interglacial periods and dies during glaciations. While environmentalists use phony scare tactics to warn about the imagined threats of global warming, the real costs of global cooling are easily seen today. The unusually thick Antarctic Sea Ice is causing a “catastrophic” breeding failure for the Antarctic Penguins. The Penguins are the canary in the coal mines for global cooling, and the catastrophic consequences that follow.

Thousands of penguin chicks starve in Antarctica

Mass starvation has wiped out thousands of penguin chicks in Antarctica, with unusually thick sea ice forcing their parents to forage further for food in what conservationists Friday called a “catastrophic breeding failure”.

French scientists, supported by WWF, have been studying a colony of 18,000 pairs of Adelie penguins in East Antarctica since 2010 and discovered only two chicks survived the most recent breeding season in early 2017.

Help Break the Silence. Global Cooling Kills. Save the Penguins, Stop the Anti-Global Warming Madness.

More Evidence Congress Needs to Investigate the Field of Climate “Science”


Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”…The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend…“Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.” “You would think that when you make adjustments you’d sometimes get warming and sometimes get cooling. That’s almost never happened,”…Their study found measurements “nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history,” which was “nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern.”

This alone is evidence of data tampering, but the resulting “adjusted” data doesn’t only show more warming, it is more linear. The only way to make the IPCC models work is to have a linear trend in temperatures. That is the smoking gun. CO2’s absorption of radiation isn’t linear, and CO2’s impact on temperatures wouldn’t be linear. The IPCC models are inconsistent with the molecular physics of CO2. The data is being altered in a manner that will make incorrect models accurate.

Read More: Source

More on this Topic: Satellite battle: Five reasons UAH is different (better) to the RSS global temperature estimates

Dr. Spencer’s Comment on this issue: Comments on the New RSS Lower Tropospheric Temperature Dataset

h/t WUWT for the Graphic

Please like, share, subscribe and comment

Finally, We Have Leaders That are Pushing Back Against This Climate Change Nonsense


EPA chief pushing governmentwide effort to question climate change science

The Trump administration is debating whether to launch a governmentwide effort to question the science of climate change, an effort that critics say is an attempt to undermine the long-established consensus human activity is fueling the Earth’s rising temperatures.

The move, driven by Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt, has sparked a debate among top Trump administration officials over whether to pursue such a strategy.

A senior White House official, who asked for anonymity because no final decision has been made, said that while Pruitt has expressed interest in the idea, “there are no formal plans within the administration to do anything about it at this time.”

Pruitt first publicly raised the idea of setting up a “red team-blue team” effort to conduct exercises to test the idea that human activity is the main driver of recent climate change in an interview with Breitbart in early June.

EPA To Launch Red Team/Blue Team Program To Evaluate Climate Science

The program will use “red team, blue team” exercises to conduct an “at-length evaluation of U.S. climate science,” the official said, referring to a concept developed by the military to identify vulnerabilities in field operations.

“The administrator believes that we will be able to recruit the best in the fields which study climate and will organize a specific process in which these individuals … provide back-and-forth critique of specific new reports on climate science,” the source said.

“We are in fact very excited about this initiative,” the official added. “Climate science, like other fields of science, is constantly changing. A new, fresh and transparent evaluation is something everyone should support doing.”

The disclosure follows the administration’s suggestions over several days that it supports reviewing climate science outside the normal peer-review process used by scientists. This is the first time agency officials acknowledged that Pruitt has begun that process. The source said Energy Secretary Rick Perry also favors the review.

Sunlight is by far the best disinfectant. Forcing Climate “Scientists” to defend themselves in a robust scientific debate that can’t rely upon unscientific claims of “peer-review,” “consensus,” and computer “models,” and force them to defend their conclusions based upon the scientific method, experimentation, reproducibility, geological records, thermodynamics, molecular/quantum physics and actual empirical data will quickly expose that the Climate Change Emperor has no clothes. It is time Toto takes a look behind the curtain. I’m pretty sure that what he finds will be pretty ugly.


Please like, share, subscribe and comment

Congress Should Investigate RSS Data “Adjustments”


The corruption in the field of climate “science” is so obvious, it is possible to predict in advance their criminal behavior. Back in January 2017, Dr. Roy Spencer made this prediction.

Dr. Roy Spencer forecasts that RSS TLT data will be altered :

“I expect there will soon be a revised TLT product from RSS which shows enhanced warming, too.

Here’s what I’m predicting:

1) neither John Christy nor I will be asked to review the paper

2) it will quickly sail through peer review (our UAH V6 paper is still not in print nearly 1 year after submission)

3) it will have many authors, including climate model people and the usual model pundits (e.g. Santer), which will supposedly lend legitimacy to the new data adjustments.

Let’s see how many of my 3 predictions come true.


It appears every one of Dr. Spencers came true.

I posted this in January. Roy Spencer predicted that Carl Mears (under pressure from the climate mafia) would corrupt his TLT data to bring it in line with the global warming scam…It has happened exactly as Roy predicted.

Here is more on the issue. You would think a 140% “adjustment” should raise some eyebrows, or at least get the person in charge of recording and publishing the “flawed” historic data fired.

Major correction to satellite data shows 140% faster warming since 1998

Researchers from Remote Sensing Systems (RSS), based in California, have released a substantially revised version of their lower tropospheric temperature record.

After correcting for problems caused by the decaying orbit of satellites, as well as other factors, they have produced a new record showing 36% faster warming since 1979 and nearly 140% faster (i.e. 2.4 times larger) warming since 1998. This is in comparison to the previous version 3 of the lower tropospheric temperature (TLT) data published in 2009.

Climate sceptics have long claimed that satellite data shows global warming to be less pronounced than observational data collected on the Earth’s surface. This new correction to the RSS data substantially undermines that argument. The new data actually shows more warming than has been observed on the surface, though still slightly less than projected in most climate models.

If a respected researcher can predict criminal behavior by others in his field, and accurately identify their MO, Congress has a responsibility to investigate these RSS “adjustments,” and at a very least fire the incompetent people in charge of the RSS equipment that was recording and publishing faulty data. There must be consequences for these actions. Either the people running the RSS equipment were incompetent, or the people making the “adjustments” are corrupt, either way, someone must be made to answer for these “adjustments.”

Please like, share, subscribe and comment

Congress Should Investigate the EPA


New Study Claims To Expose The ‘Science Charade’ Behind Some EPA Regulations

A new study highlights how the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is able to game the rule-making system to cloak contentious policy decisions as based on science.

Susan Dudley, president of the George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center, and Marcus Peacock, executive vice president of the Business Roundtable, published a report to highlight the “perverse incentives involved in developing regulations” as part of EPA’s air quality setting standards.

BTW, the CO2 in your lungs can be as high as 40,000 ppm. You exhale CO2 with every breath. CO2 is plant food, and the earth’s capacity to support life as we know it ends when CO2 falls below 180 ppm. CO2 is necessary to regulate the pH of your blood. This essential life sustaining organic molecule has been ruled to be a pollutant by the EPA.

Read More: New Study

Please like, share, subscribe and comment

The Corruption of Science in One Graphic


H/T to the Real Science Blog

Please like, share, subscribe and comment.