Climate “Science” on Trial; The Forensic Files: Exhibit D

Exhibit D: There simply isn’t enough Anthropocentric CO2 to make a difference

ohio-stadium-kk

Talking Points:

  1. OSU Stadium holds 100,000 Buckeye Fans and atmospheric CO2 is 400 ppm. If every Buckeye Fan represents one atmospheric molecule, then 40 Buckeye Fans would represent atmospheric CO2. Man, however, is not responsible for all the atmospheric CO2, and is responsible for at most 15 of those 40 molecules of CO2. Man’s contribution to atmospheric CO2 is the equivalent of 15 Buckeye Fans in OSU Stadium. Here is another graphic demonstrating 1 molecule out of 2,500.co2-onemolecule
  2. CO2 is a trace gas at 400 ppm, and its contribution to global warming is to trap a very narrow band of outgoing radiation between 13 and 18 microns. Those wavelengths are consistent with a black body of temperature -80 degrees Celsius. It is hard to warm something with a temperature of 18 degrees Celsius with energy consistent with a much colder body. The law of entropy has energy going from high-energy states to low-energy states.
  3. CO2 is 0.00004 or 0.04% of the atmosphere. Is it plausible that “activating” 1 out of every 2,500 molecules in the atmosphere can actually result in a material temperature change? That energy also is distributed/diluted throughout the entire atmosphere and is not concentrated in the lower troposphere, like water vapor.co2-h2o-atmospheric-concentration
  4. Unfortunately, simple experiments to demonstrate even the basics of this “science” haven’t been properly run or even tried. What efforts have been attempted are complete jokes from the perspective of real science. Anthony Watts shows no mercy when he “peer reviews” Al Gore’s and Bill Nye’s effort to demonstrate the GHG effect of CO2. It is truly alarming how such foundational figures can’t demonstrate even the basics of the “science” that they have manufactured and promoted at great tax-payer expense.
  5. Does it seem plausible that “thermalizing” 1 out of every 2,500 molecules can make a material difference upon the remaining 2,499? Especially when its energy if consistent with a black body of temperature -80 degrees Celsius?
  6. CO2 is evenly distributed at 400 ppm up to 80 km, most H2O precipitates out by 10 km. You be the judge, this chart shows atmospheric H2O and atmospheric temperature. Can you even tell the difference between the charts? Temperature clearly follows H2O, not CO2.h2o-and-temperature-cross
Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Climate “Science” on Trial; The Forensic Files: Exhibit D”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s