EPA Chief Scott Pruitt Should Counter-sue The Climate Loons

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Believe it to not, the climate loons have actually sued EPA Chief Scott Pruit for “climate science denial.” No that isn’t a joke.

Pruitt Should Put Up Evidence Supporting Stance or Cease Climate Denials

Posted on Apr 13, 2017 | Tags: climate, EPA

Washington, DC — A lawsuit filed today seeks the data that U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt relied upon in making statements that human activity is not a “primary contributor” to climate change. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) also seeks to determine whether EPA possesses a single study that supports Mr. Pruitt’s stance.

Scott Pruitt should countersue and finally force the climate loons to prove their case is court. Fortunately, I’ve been preparing for this opportunity for years, and already have a pre-packaged prosecution: Climate “Science” on Trial; The Criminal Case Against the Alarmists.

How to Discuss Global Warming with a “Climate Alarmist.” Scientific Talking Points to Win the Debate.

The climate alarmist’s case is built upon pillars of sand and will crumble under scrutiny: Climate “Science” Pillars of Sand; Eroding the Foundation of the Hoax

When you boil it down, climate “science” is nothing more that the most recent leftist social movement: Climate Change is a Political Battle, Not a Scientific One.

At best, climate “science” can be called pseudoscience: Climate “Science” is Pseudo-Science; A Point-by-Point Proof.

If this were a real “science” the evidence presented would be valid models that explain the climate. They simply don’t exist: Climate “Science” on Trial; If Something is Understood, it can be Modeled.

Not only do no accurate models exist, there are no experiments either: Climate “Science” on Trial; Confirmed Mythbusters Busted Practicing Science Sophistry.

The unadjusted and satellite data certainly don’t support the alarmists’ claims:

Ceteris Paribus; Less is More, Use Only Data Sets That Don’t Require “Adjustments.”

Climate “Science” on Trial; Temperature Records Don’t Support NASA GISS

Climate “Science” on Trial; Cherry Picking Locations to Manufacture Warming

Climate “Science” on Trial; How Does Ice Melt In Sub-Zero Temperatures?

They offer no real solutions, and their solutions do more harm than good: Hey, Genius!!! Thick Polar Sea Ice Kills Whales and Polar Bears

With Friends Like Environmentalists, the World Doesn’t Need Enemies

“It’s Official, Global Warming and Higher CO2 Ended the California Drought!!!”

Climate “Science” on Trial; Germany Builds Wind Farms While NATO Burns

Climate “Science” on Trial; Clear-Cutting Forests to Save the Trees

Even if there are costs, they don’t outweigh the benefits: Just How Much Does 1 Degree C Cost?

The Benefits of Higher CO2 Levels; Fewer Hurricanes, Greater Prosperity, Longer Life

The major claims made by the climate alarmists simply aren’t supported by the evidence: Y=mX+b, how does Constant CO2 Cause a Change in Temperature?

Coral Reef Sophistry

American Lung Association Never Mentions CO2 as Harmful to Human Health

Northern Atlantic Storm Shows How Natural Causes Affect Arctic Sea Ice

The main basis for support, peer review and consensus are baseless: Scientists Not Served Here; Real Scientists Need Not Apply

Climate Bullies Gone Wild; Caught on Tape and Print

Climate “Science” on Trial; The Consensus is more Con and NonSense than Science

There is a long history of climate “science” fraud just waiting to be exposed: Climate Science Behaving Badly; 50 Shades of Green & The Torture Timeline

The real fact is that the climate alarmists don’t have anything to support their claims so they rely on political theater, intimidation, and bullying to perpetuate the illusion of validity. It is time we pull the curtain away and expose this hoax in the court of law.

Michael Mann Just Jumped the Climate Change Shark

I Am Woman Hear Me Roar; Michael Mann’s Bullying Backfires

Climate “Science” Gone Mad; The True Face of Envirofascism

Climate “Science” on Trial; Climate McCartyism

Rules for Climate Radicals; “Accuse the Other Side of That Which You Are Guilty”

Please like, share, subscribe and comment…and forward on to Scott Pruitt at the EPA.


3 thoughts on “EPA Chief Scott Pruitt Should Counter-sue The Climate Loons”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s