Believe it to not, the climate loons have actually sued EPA Chief Scott Pruit for “climate science denial.” No that isn’t a joke.
EPA’S PRUITT SUED TO BACK UP CLIMATE CHANGE CLAIMS
Pruitt Should Put Up Evidence Supporting Stance or Cease Climate Denials
Posted on Apr 13, 2017 | Tags: climate, EPA
Washington, DC — A lawsuit filed today seeks the data that U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt relied upon in making statements that human activity is not a “primary contributor” to climate change. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) also seeks to determine whether EPA possesses a single study that supports Mr. Pruitt’s stance.
Scott Pruitt should countersue and finally force the climate loons to prove their case is court. Fortunately, I’ve been preparing for this opportunity for years, and already have a pre-packaged prosecution: Climate “Science” on Trial; The Criminal Case Against the Alarmists.
The climate alarmist’s case is built upon pillars of sand and will crumble under scrutiny: Climate “Science” Pillars of Sand; Eroding the Foundation of the Hoax
When you boil it down, climate “science” is nothing more that the most recent leftist social movement: Climate Change is a Political Battle, Not a Scientific One.
At best, climate “science” can be called pseudoscience: Climate “Science” is Pseudo-Science; A Point-by-Point Proof.
If this were a real “science” the evidence presented would be valid models that explain the climate. They simply don’t exist: Climate “Science” on Trial; If Something is Understood, it can be Modeled.
Not only do no accurate models exist, there are no experiments either: Climate “Science” on Trial; Confirmed Mythbusters Busted Practicing Science Sophistry.
The unadjusted and satellite data certainly don’t support the alarmists’ claims:
They offer no real solutions, and their solutions do more harm than good: Hey, Genius!!! Thick Polar Sea Ice Kills Whales and Polar Bears
Even if there are costs, they don’t outweigh the benefits: Just How Much Does 1 Degree C Cost?
The major claims made by the climate alarmists simply aren’t supported by the evidence: Y=mX+b, how does Constant CO2 Cause a Change in Temperature?
The main basis for support, peer review and consensus are baseless: Scientists Not Served Here; Real Scientists Need Not Apply
There is a long history of climate “science” fraud just waiting to be exposed: Climate Science Behaving Badly; 50 Shades of Green & The Torture Timeline
The real fact is that the climate alarmists don’t have anything to support their claims so they rely on political theater, intimidation, and bullying to perpetuate the illusion of validity. It is time we pull the curtain away and expose this hoax in the court of law.
Please like, share, subscribe and comment…and forward on to Scott Pruitt at the EPA.