More Evidence Congress Needs to Investigate the Field of Climate “Science”


Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data

A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.”…The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend…“Each dataset pushed down the 1940s warming and pushed up the current warming.” “You would think that when you make adjustments you’d sometimes get warming and sometimes get cooling. That’s almost never happened,”…Their study found measurements “nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history,” which was “nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern.”

This alone is evidence of data tampering, but the resulting “adjusted” data doesn’t only show more warming, it is more linear. The only way to make the IPCC models work is to have a linear trend in temperatures. That is the smoking gun. CO2’s absorption of radiation isn’t linear, and CO2’s impact on temperatures wouldn’t be linear. The IPCC models are inconsistent with the molecular physics of CO2. The data is being altered in a manner that will make incorrect models accurate.

Read More: Source

More on this Topic: Satellite battle: Five reasons UAH is different (better) to the RSS global temperature estimates

Dr. Spencer’s Comment on this issue: Comments on the New RSS Lower Tropospheric Temperature Dataset

h/t WUWT for the Graphic

Please like, share, subscribe and comment


3 thoughts on “More Evidence Congress Needs to Investigate the Field of Climate “Science””

  1. This shows what has long been suspected, temperature data are not temperature readings but are just numbers that are statistically adjusted to prove the unprovable. The UN-IPCC basic tenet for existing and the models upon which they rely are now in jeopardy.
    Couple that to the Mann case, and his erasing of past climate variations that the UN-IPCC and the AGW adherents often quoted, and little if anything of their imagined idea of dangerous man-made global warming remains. What is left is normal natural variation and not much else.

    We should take comfort now, cherish this world we have, and realize that humans are not controlling the climate. We should take on board that the current warm period is to be enjoyed without guilt, for all too soon natural processes will continue their normal cyclic variation and the cold will return.


  2. Observational evidence of CO2 ‘trapping the heat’?
    If CO2 is supposed to ‘trap the heat’ how come the effects of all those El Niños are so short lived?
    If that’s the best CO2 can do, well I can live with that.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s