Climate “Deniers” Winning Big in San Francisco Courts!!! Facts Trump Fake Science

exxon_tiger

Post Publishing Information:

If Society Can’t Trust Science, What Can They Trust? Climate Sophist is Playing San Francisco Judge as a Complete Fool

Climate Sophistry In San Francisco; Half-Truths are Twice the Lie

Original Post Follows:

Here at CO2isLife we have always believed that the best way to expose the AGW Hoax was to put slimate clience on trial. The original posts on this blog formulated a prosecution of slimate clience and were titled “Climate Science on Trial; The Forensic Files: Exhibit A thru Z. They were created to help the lawyers formulate a defense against the alarmists. Well, a trial just happened, and it didn’t turn out well for the climate alarmists. A judge in San Francisco is considering throwing out the climate alarmist’s case. If the climate alarmists can’t win in San Francisco, they have zero chance of winning anywhere else. The truth and facts simply trump fake science and propaganda.

Courtcase

That is great news, however, when I started to write this blog post I was not aware of the outcome. I was going to write another post to help the lawyers in San Francisco and future cases regarding this issue. My original concern was that the defense would get too technical, allowing the prosecution to muddy the waters and obfuscate the issue to their advantage. The defense had published a brief by a group of prominent skeptics which was very well thought-out and detailed but which opened the door to the prosecution to bicker over the minutia and facts in order to confuse the matter.

Einstein once said, “No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.” That is how real science is performed, you reject the null with an experiment. You don’t need a 10-page lecture on climate change and global warming, you simply need one example where the model doesn’t fit. Not 100, not 10,000, not 100,000, not a consensus, you simply need one.

Ignoring that none of the models used by the IPCC have any predictive power at all, and provide far more evidence to reject than affirm the climate alarmist’s position, the best approach to disproving the claims of the climate alarmists is through simple sound science. KISS, Keep it Simple Stupid, or keep it simple and focused. The one example that debunks the alarmist’s claims best is the one that controls for all factors but CO2. That example is Antarctica, and it has shone no warming over the past 50+ years even with the material increase in CO2. That experiment is detailed in the following linked post:

Isolating the Contribution of CO2 on Atmospheric Temperature

Similar experiments are detailed in this following linked posts:

Ceteris Paribus and Global Warming; Ground Measurements are Garbage

CO2 is 33% Higher and Temperatures are Currently Making 100 Yr Record LOWS

Also, drawing from the movie “My Cousin Vinny,” asking the question like “Do the laws of physics cease to exist in your Kitchen,” are great ways to end a court case quick. Many of the claims made by the alarmists defy physics, like the Mt Kilimanjaro Glacier “melting” in sub-zero temperatures.

Climate “Science” on Trial; How Does Ice Melt In Sub-Zero Temperatures?

Lastly, Lawyers involved in cases against climate alarmists should read the following:

Climate “Science” on Trial; The Criminal Case Against the Alarmists

Climate “Science” on Trial; Cherry Picking Locations to Manufacture Warming

Climate Science Behaving Badly; 50 Shades of Green & The Torture Timeline

Climate Science on Trial: Exhibits A-Z

Additional Reading:

High School Climate Change Term Paper for Those Who Don’t Want to Follow the Herd

Climate Change Global Warming Homework to Piss Off Your Teacher

Climate Change Science Fair Project; CO2 and Global Warming

Climate “Science” is Pseudo-Science; A Point-by-Point Proof

How to Discuss Global Warming with a “Climate Alarmist.” Scientific Talking Points to Win the Debate.

Post Publishing Edits:

The Judge has not thrown out the case, Exxon has filed a motion to dismiss.

It looks like the court case was a bloodbath for the Climate Alarmists. A Dr. Miles Allen from Oxford used a misleading chart representing CO2’s 400 ppm concentration, and both San Francisco and Oakland have issued Public Bonds discounting the risk of climate change. Well, you can’t say we didn’t try to warn them. There is no way this garbage will ever pass a competent judge.

Please Like, Share, Subscribe and Comment

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Climate “Deniers” Winning Big in San Francisco Courts!!! Facts Trump Fake Science”

  1. Perhaps the derogatory term “climate deniers” shouldn’t be used as there are very few people who deny climate. People skeptical of the current alarmist view are hardly “deniers of climate.” There is no good reason to dignify the name-calling of the anti-science crowd by even acknowledging their made up terms.
    Secondly, skeptics, actual science, and common sense really haven’t won much of anything yet as the only thing that has happened is that a motion to dismiss has been filed. The hearing on the motion to dismiss has not even been scheduled as of today but likely to be scheduled withing the next two weeks.
    We need to keep our fact straight…

    Like

    1. I made the edits and included a link to the motion to dismiss. Sticking with Denier however it emphasizes the extreme dishonest tactics the climate alarmists use.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s