Climate Change Double Standard Double Speak Proves Slimate Clience is a Fraud


This slideshow requires JavaScript.

At CO2 is Life we’ve maintained that Slimate Clience isn’t a true “science” but is simply the liberal cause du jour. Climate Change is a political movement, not a scientific pursuit. One week liberals are promoting the foundation of Nazism Eugenics, then they are spitting on our soldiers returning from Vietnam, then they are celebrating the “victory” of protecting the “right” to partial-birth abortions, then they are defending Bill Clinton against rape charges, then they are making Sexual Harassment the political issue to defeat Donald Trump, then they are fearing a coming ice age, then global warming, then climate change, and now climate crisis. More recently they liberals have been destroying the NFL and ESPN, beating people in the street for exercising their right to assemble, and burning down Berkeley because they disagree with a planned speaker. Other major contributions to society liberals have made are bullying Christian bakers, misrepresenting heinous crimes as hate crimes, framing innocent WHITE college students, creating an “Affordable” Care Act that is anything but, and the list goes on. Trying to understand the liberal mind is futile if you apply reason, logic, facts, analysis, science and common sense.

To understand climate change you must understand the liberal mind, and to do that you have to understand politics and psychology. First and foremost, liberals suffer from crippling delusions of grandeur combined with epic inferiority complexes. Liberals, after all, spend a lifetime with people laughing behind their backs about the liberal arts degree that they hold, so they overcompensate. That is why they are so susceptible to grand quixotic ventures to “save the planet.” Only the genius of the liberal brain can understand that to save the world we must ban plastic water bottles and the production of CO2. They stew over all the styrofoam cups being discarded as they work at Starbucks as baristas. Liberals are also herd animals longing to belong to any group that will accept them, any group that is, except Christian Conservatives. Liberals will also promote one agenda in public and hold totally different personal views, being a member of the herd is infinitely more important than being an individual.

To prove their sanctimonious superiority they will go to extreme measures to prove their position on the moral high ground over Conservatives. The results are events like San Francisco sentencing the killer of Kate Steinle to time served, and feminists supporting Hijabs and Islam. They also ruined the Star Wars franchise by pushing their nauseating sanctimonious social justice agenda. To understand the liberal mindset all you have to do is ask yourself “what position would a conservative take?” And then take the exact opposite position. You simply “resist.” It literally is that easy, and Tammy Bruce did an outstanding job documenting that fact in her book “Death of Right and Wrong.” She left the NOW LA Chapter after the feminist organization refused to take a position in the OJ Simpson murder case. That same phenomenon can be witnessed today as Rap Music has gone almost completely unnoticed to the “MeToo” crowd.

This kind of cognitive dissonance also dominates the topic of Climate Change. Just recently President Trump made a mocking “Tweet” about the record cold hitting the East Coast and the Global Warming Alarmists.


The liberals stoned on Kool-Aid went berserk, attacking President Trump for not knowing the difference between climate and weather.


Climate “Expert” Al Gore then Tweeted about Climate Guru Michael Mann’s new article about how the record cold is in fact evidence and the expected outcome of global warming, sorry climate change. I cover that article in another post. Liberals didn’t attack Al Gore or Michael Mann, they just believe it when Al says it, and don’t believe it when President Trump says it. They are like unthinking Pod People, blindly obeying a central authority, never really thinking about their actions, they just follow instructions.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Liberals can take one position, that the recent record cold is normal and natural, when they are taking the position opposite of President Trump. Liberals can then take the exact opposite position when they are defending Al Gore and Michael Mann. The position a liberal will take isn’t dependent upon the science, data or facts, the position a liberal will take is dependent upon who is making the claim. If Conservative believe the facts point to climate change being a fraud, liberals will defend it to the death as scientific truth. Liberals are so oblivious to the facts that The Guardian recently published an article about global warming and defended their position by using quotes that disprove the very position they were intended to defend.

The Guardian could have run an article stating that lead will float, and then made a video demonstrating that lead sinks like a rock, and its readers would have simply continued to believe lead can float. The complete and absolute lack of critical thinking that supports this leftist climate change movement is truly frightening. Fortunately, the liberals on the East Coast are being given a very hard to ignore warning that preparing for global warming while the real threat is global cooling can be very very very dangerous. Wind and solar won’t heat your home, power your cars, and plow the snow off the streets. Oil, Coal, Nuclear, and Gasoline will. The East Coast should be building natural gas pipelines, not wind and solar farms.

Lastly, President Obama gave us the worst post-war recovery in history, and Liberals loved him. President Trump triggered a record-setting year on Wall Street and restored economic growth simply by undoing what President Obama had been doing. Liberals hate him. It is undeniable that President Obama’s actions were the cause of the rise of ISIS and pervasive economic malaise, and President Trump is the reason for the defeat of ISIS and economic recovery. Black unemployment is at 17 year lows, the Dow is above 25,000, economic growth is above 3%, 2 million fewer people on food stamps, Trump’s “Change” has returned “Hope” to America, and liberals hate him. Could you imagine the positive press President Obama would have gotten if he had had just a fraction of the success that President Trump has had? President Obama was loved by the Liberals for losing, and Liberals hate President Trump for winning. I guess some people would prefer riding the pine and warming those benches over winning, just as long as the coach was a liberal.

Post Publishing Edit: US cold snap was a freak of nature, quick analysis finds

Looks like even the non-Climate Experts at the AP can easily prove Michael Mann and Al Gore wrong.

Please Like, Share, Subscribe and Comment.


Climate Crisis? Al Gore and Michael Mann Fail Science 101

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

I recently wrote a post titled “Liberals Will Believe Anything,” in which I demonstrated that even the most ridiculous claims will be accepted as fact by kool-aid addicted liberals. I followed it up with a post addressing an article in The Guardian that made a claim and backed it up with quotes that proved their position 100% false. In another post, I highlighted the appalling record of failed claims made by the alarmists and followed it up with another post on the same topic. The point is that when a liberal finds themselves in a Climate Change Hole, they don’t ask for a ladder to climb out, they ask for a bigger shovel. The goal isn’t to find the truth, the goal is to keep the Climate Change Gravy Train running full speed ahead. Maintaining political momentum is the objective, not discovering the truth.

In this post I will address Michael Mann’s assertion that record cold temperatures are the result of man-made CO2 as detailed in a recent Climate Reality Project article, mentioned by Al Gore in his “Tweet.” Before I go any further, without addressing any of his claims, the important take home is that even if Al Gore and Michael Mann are 100% correct in their analysis and conclusion, the solutions they offer will only make matters worse.

  1. If CO2 causes more drought, biofuels like Ethanol are idiotic solutions as best.
  2. If CO2 causes more rain, then solar is an idiotic solution at best.
  3. If CO2 causes colder and snowier winters, then Wind and Solar are idiotic solutions at best.
  4. If CO2 causes warmer winters and less snow, then what’s the problem?
  5. If CO2 causes more extreme weather like tornados and hurricanes, then Wind and Solar are idiotic solutions at best.
  6. If we want to protect endangered species of birds, then Wind and Solar are idiotic solutions at best.
  7. If we want a reliable source of energy that doesn’t require a coal-powered plant as back up, then Wind and Solar are idiotic solutions as best.
  8. If we want a reliable fuel source so we can plow our streets, then Wind and Solar are idiotic solutions at best.
  9. If CO2 is going to flood NYC, then Wind and Solar are idiotic solutions at best.

Building more natural gas pipelines, dams and nuclear power plants are real solutions to the problem of climate change.

Facts are, even if Michael Mann and Al Gore are 100% correct, they have absolutely no viable solutions to the problem. Their nonsensical solutions make society worse off, and their cure is far worse than the illness. That being said, let’s take a look at Michael Mann’s explanation as to how CO2 can cause such record cold spells.

Ignoring the facts that the current cold is a weather phenomenon, not a change in climate, the problem Michael Mann and the climate alarmists face is that the only mechanism defined by which CO2 can affect climate change is be trapping outgoing IR radiation between 13 and 18µ. That is the only defined mechanism, and the only result possible is the “thermalization” of those wavelengths resulting in atmospheric WARMING. There is no way for “thermalization” to result in cooling…none. How then, does Michael Mann address this issue?

World-renowned climate scientist Dr. Michael Mann explains why the bitter cold and snowy conditions gripping the US are “an example of precisely the sort of extreme winter weather we expect because of climate change.”

Claim #1:

Global warming is leading to later freeze-up of the Great Lakes and warmer lake temperatures. It is the collision of cold Arctic air with relatively warm unfrozen lake water in early winter that causes lake effect snows in the first place. The warmer those lake temperatures, the more moisture in the air, and the greater potential for lake effect snows. Not surprisingly, we see a long-term increase in lake effect snowfalls as temperatures have warmed during the last century

The first problem with this explanation is that it may explain the increase in snow, but doesn’t explain how thermalizing outgoing IR radiation can result in the record colds. The second problem is that IR between 13 and 18µ doesn’t warm water. If the lakes are warming it is because more warming visible radiation is reaching them, not because of outgoing IR radiation. The last issue is that the chart they provided as evidence doesn’t show a relationship between CO2 and lake effect. The chart clearly demonstrates a non-linear pattern with an uptrend between 1930 and the peak, and then a downtrend between the peak and the current. Ironically, the current level looks to be just about average. The peak is most likely 1979 during the coming ice age scare, and the current level is way way way below that level, yet CO2 is about 20% higher.


Claim #2:

How about those frigid low temperatures back east this winter? Surely that extreme cold must disprove global warming?

Once again, the claim is misguided. While we have seen some daily all-time lows for a smattering of locations in the US, these pale in comparison with the number of all-time highs we’ve seen over the past year. In fact, the record highs have outpaced the record lows 61 to seven, i.e. nine times more often (see table below), consistent with what we expect to see as the globe continues to warm.

News Flash!!! Trapping outgoing IR doesn’t result in warming, it slows cooling. Putting a blanket on something doesn’t warm it, it stops it from losing heat. Record high temperatures require energy to be put into the system. Record high temperatures are the result of more warming visible radiation reaching the earth. That requires fewer clouds, lower particulate matter, and a hotter sun. The warming of the oceans is evidence of the fact that more warming visible radiation is reaching the earth, and the oceans control the global climate. Understand the oceans and you understand the global climate, and it has nothing to do with CO2. If CO2 were the cause of the warming, you would see a narrowing of the spread between the nighttime and the daytime temperatures, especially in the dry deserts, which isn’t happening. You would also see a warming in Antarctica, the natural control for the effect of CO2, which also isn’t happening. Putting a focus on the record high daytime temperatures is sophistry at its best. Also, the ground measurements are highly “adjusted” and unreliable.

Claim #3:

But what about this pattern of cold in the eastern US and warm in the western US? This so-called “dipole” pattern has become more common in recent winters, and recent research suggests that climate change may be favoring this contrast in temperature by causing the jet stream to meander in a particular pattern, with an upward meander or “ridge” in the west bringing warm air up from the south and a downward meander or “trough” in the east, bringing cold air down from the north. Some scientists think that the dramatic loss of sea ice in the Arctic may be favoring this jet stream pattern.

More sophistry. First, warm ocean waters are melting the Arctic Sea Ice, not the atmosphere. CO2, as mentioned, doesn’t warm water. CO2 is also evenly dispersed throughout the atmosphere, so you can’t blame regional differences on it, CO2 is a constant. The jet stream may be impacted by atmospheric warming, but that warming isn’t due to CO2, and most likely impacted by natural phenomena like El Niño and La Niña. Anyway, satellite data shows no warming over the past 20 years. What is most likely the cause is La Niña cooling the equatorial zone, resulting in lower pressures, allowing the arctic air to more easily travel south. To complicate things, the sun has been sleeping, pointing to cooler temperatures in the future…regardless of the level of CO2.

Claim #4:

Once again, rather the opposite is true. East Coast winter storms, known as “nor’easters” because of the unusual northeasterly direction of the winds as the storm spirals in from the south, are unusual in that they derive their energy not just from large contrasts in temperature that drive most extratropical storm systems, but also from the energy released when water evaporates from the (relatively warm) ocean surface into the atmosphere.

More sophistry. If this is the cause, you have to be able to explain how CO2, and IR radiation between 13 and 18µ can warm the oceans? It can’t and doesn’t.

Claim #5:

As the oceans continue to warm, cold Arctic air masses collide with increasingly warm Atlantic Ocean waters. That means larger temperature contrasts and potentially stronger storms. But those warmer oceans also mean more moisture in the atmosphere, even more energy to strengthen the storm, and the potential for larger snowfalls. We might, if you’ll forgive the pun, call this a “perfect storm” of factors for intensification.

Indeed, climate model simulations indicate that we can expect more intense nor’easters as human-caused climate change continues to warm the oceans.

Once again, the focus is on the oceans. I agree, if you understand the oceans, you understand the global climate. CO2 can’t and doesn’t warm the oceans. Also, the climate models are an embarrassing waste of money, and offer more proof against the CO2 AGW theory then they do support.

Claim #6:

This leads us back to the current strengthening storm. The entire North Atlantic is unusually warm right now (+0.6 degrees Celsius) relative to the already-globally-warmed late twentieth century (1971-2000) average, and there are large patches of ocean water off the US East Coast that are 2-4 degrees Celsius above that average. The storm will be encountering that exceptional ocean heat as it travels northward along the US coastline, and that is part of why it has a very good chance of becoming the most intense nor’easter we’ve yet observed.

So, to the climate change doubters and deniers out there, the unusual weather we’re seeing this winter is in no way evidence against climate change. It is an example of precisely the sort of extreme winter weather we expect because of climate change.

More sophistry. 0.6 Degrees is well within the normal variation for a single day. There are plenty of times when we’ve had similar temperature gradients and we didn’t have bad storms. Once again, however, they focus on the warm oceans. If you are going to identify the warm oceans as the cause, which they are, you have to explain how CO2 can cause the oceans to warm. That is an easy lab experiment. Simply put a bucket of water in a dark room and illuminate the bucket of water with IR between 13 and 18µ. If the temperature changes, then you have a case, if it doesn’t you are barking up the wrong tree. I assure you, that is one experiment Al Gore and Michael Mann will never perform. That would be the equivalent of Toto looking behind the curtain and exposing the Wizard as the fraud that he was.

Please like, share, subscribe and comment.

Alarmist Predictions Aren’t Even In The Ball Park


What is truly alarming is how the slimate clientists can continue to make nonsensical and extremely inaccurate predictions, and yet maintain some public support. I have demonstrated that The Guardian can publish articles making alarmist claims and support them with quotes that prove just the opposite. The truth, facts, and experimental and empirical results simply don’t matter to the climate alarmist crowd.


Like The Guardian, Newsweek appears desperate and is currently claiming that the earth is headed to becoming a desert. That claim demonstrates an ignorance of geology, chemistry, physics, biology and basic science on a biblical scale. CO2 used to be 7000 ppm during the Cambrian, and 1500 ppm during the Jurassic through Cretacious periods. These were likely the greenest, wettest and liveliest times in earth’s history. Warmer air holds more water. More CO2 means more and denser vegetation. Animals grew to enormous heights to take advantage of the towering vegetation that grew.

The expected result of more CO2 is exactly what is happening, a greening of the globe, not a drying. More CO2 allows plants to grow further up mountains due to more CO2 at higher altitudes and in dryer climates due to the shrinking of their stomata density reducing the rate of transpiration.


More precipitation, not more drought, is what is expected with more CO2, and that is exactly what has been happening. Once again, more CO2 allows for more vegetation to grow. Vegetation is a major contributor to atmospheric humidity. Warmer air also holds more water vapor. There is no mechanism by which more CO2 would result in more deserts and a drier climate. None. Plants die when CO2 falls below 150 ppm. If you want to see a global desert, drop CO2 below 150 ppm and watch every green acre of farmland turn to dust, and watch the clouds disappear from the sky allowing the drying visible radiation to bake the dirt during the day. Drop the temperatures and an ice age will rapidly remove habitable land from the map Bottom line, CO2 isn’t the villain, CO2 is a savior. CO2, after all, is plant food, on which all of humanity depends.

The Guardian, Newsweek, and self interested Slimate Clientists prove that America is in serious need of improving its education in scientist and critical thinking. The press no longer appears to be concerned with the truth and exposing corruption, they are taking an active role in deceiving the public and enabling the corruption. It is unlikely that any free society will remain so in the long run if the Press sides with the tyrants over the public. Germany is proving following the path to a “green economy” is following a path to ruin. Others should not follow.

Please Like, Share, Subscribe and Comment.


No Joke. During Record Cold Spell, The Guardian Warns of Global Warming


This isn’t a joke. On 01/01/2018, during a record cold spell, the Guardian is running an article about Edward Teller warning the Oil Industry about Global Warming. Yes, “Global Warming,” not “Climate Change.” Clearly, the evidence since 1959, and the complete and absolute failure of the IPCC to model this theory mean nothing to them. Why let the truth stand in the way of a good propaganda campaign?


  1. Models attempting to model the CO2 AGW theory have failed miserably.
  2. The simple physics of the GHG effect don’t implicate CO2, it implicates H20
  3. The green cure is often more costly than the professed free-market illness
  4. The green cures are often costly and ineffective and divert precious research dollars away from real solutions
  5. Green cures divert money away from addressing real immediate societal problems
  6. Evidence of warming doesn’t prove man is causing that warming, see #1 above.

Most perversely, The Guardian highlights a quote that has been proven 100% false. The Guardian literally published a quote that completely disproves the point they are trying to make. (Emphasis Mine in Following Quote)

Carbon dioxide has a strange property. It transmits visible light but it absorbs the infrared radiation which is emitted from the earth. Its presence in the atmosphere causes a greenhouse effect [….] It has been calculated that a temperature rise corresponding to a 10 per cent increase in carbon dioxide will be sufficient to melt the icecap and submerge New York. All the coastal cities would be covered, and since a considerable percentage of the human race lives in coastal regions, I think that this chemical contamination is more serious than most people tend to believe.

In 1959 CO2 was 315ppm, the current level is 405ppm, or 29% above the level in 1959 when the claim that a 10% increase would flood NYC was made. Dr. Teller’s theory wasn’t even remotely accurate, and yet The Guardian is treating him as if he was some Biblical Climate Prophet. Facts are, the rate of sea level rise in NYC remains unchanged over the past 150 years, and the North Pole has more ice on it today than it did in 1959 when the USS Skate found it to be ice-freeuss-skate-open-water

The Guardian demonstrates the most dangerous aspect of this slimate clience movement, facts and results simply don’t matter. There is a religious fervor that surrounds it, and no matter what the outcome is, there is only one cause, CO2. The Guardian is so blinded by their ideology, and confidence in the gullibility, absolute ignorance, and blind faith/devotion of their readers, that they can actually publish data contrary to their conclusion, and no one bats an eye. Slimate Clience is more Mythology, Science Fiction, and Politics than it is Real Science. The Guarding takes the meaning of Fake News and Junk Science to a whole new level.

Please Like, Share, Subscribe and Comment.


CO2 is 33% Higher and Temperatures are Currently Making 100 Yr Record LOWS


CO2 in 1918 was 303ppm, CO2 today is 405ppm, a full 33% higher. The result? Temperatures in the US are making 100-year record LOWS!!! What kind of “science” would rely on a model where the independent variable can change by 33% and have no impact on the dependent variable? That isn’t science, that is Witchcraft.

Cold air rivaling that of the past 100 years for early January will make it painful to be outdoors and may lead to damage in the central and northeastern United States.

Please Like, Share, Subscribe and Comment.


Prosecute Slimate Clientists for False Statements and Defrauding the Public


The above graphic comes from an article written back in 2001. In the article, it clearly identifies that 1) James Hansen testified before Congress and 2) James Hansen made provable material false statements. 30 years after the 1988 interview, the far upper end or the range of “expert” Hansen’s range, not a single prediction is even is even remotely close to being reached. To be fair, he may technically have until the end of 2019, but none of the trends are headed in the right direction.

New York is rated one of the Safest Big Cities in the USA.

There is no water shortage in NYC, or anywhere in the USA for that matter. Even the drought in California has ended.

Temperatures have been flat over the past 30 years, and current temperatures are BELOW the level of January 1988, and way below the peak of 1998. From the chart it is evident that atmospheric temperatures follow El Niño and La Niña, not CO2.

New York, where the interview was held, just missed the COLDEST New Year’s Eve in over 100 years by 2°C. It was the coldest since 1962.

Battery Park Sea Level Trend remains unaltered for over 150 years. There is ZERO evidence of sea level acceleration in New York City.

Other claims Jim Hansen made about the Arctic Sea Ice failed…miserably as well.

Al Gore’s movie is so full of errors that the UK ruled it a “Political Film.” “Political Film” is a euphemism for propaganda.

The “Green House” effect James Hansen testified about has been grossly exaggerated and misrepresented by the climate alarmists. CO2 is far from being the villain that it is portrayed to be, and H20’s effect dominates the climate system.

Waste in the “Green Economy” programs is rampant.

The results of this “Green Spending” are abysmal.

The “Green Solutions” are ridiculous and counterproductive.


Having a Ph.D. and fancy title to mask a political agenda doesn’t grant someone the right to defraud the public, and misallocate precious public resources. Accountability is badly needed in slimate clience. UK Judges have already found “An Inconvenient Truth” to be propaganda. Just because the political left has the will and ability to manufacture an elaborate hoax designed to misallocate public resources in their favor, doesn’t mean that America should allow them to get away with it. Dr. Judith Curry has worked tirelessly to expose the undeniable fact as proven by Jim Hanson’s unbroken record of failed predictions, that slimate clientists speak with a certainty that is completely unjustified by the real science backing our understanding of the climate.

Ironically, back in 1990, the IPCC was claiming that there was no evidence of an acceleration of sea levels. While this was 2 years after the interview, this data would certainly have been known to anyone deserving of the title “expert.” These inconvenient facts are just simply ignored by the “experts” because they don’t support their alarmist political agenda.Cvec_HVUkAETxhp_shadow

While I would never support Orwellian Policies that would inhibit real scientists from speaking the truth, even if they are proven to later be wrong. That is the very nature of science. You make the best guess based on the knowledge, data, and understanding at the time. As new information is discovered, the conclusions often do and should change. If new data is discovered that allows the rejection of the status quo through the scientific method, then that is the proper application of real science. Science is the unbiased search for the truth, not the biased search for arguments to support a political agenda.

That, however, doesn’t happen in slimate clience. With slimate clience, data and evidence that works to reject the CO2 based AGW theory are often ignored, discounted, censored or worse, the scientists themselves are attacked. The fact that all of the IPCC Climate Models have failed and all overestimated global temperatures and all overestimated the relationship between temperature and CO2 is scientific proof that slimate clience isn’t a science at all, it is simply a clever attempt to mask a political agenda as science.


The facts are that slimate clientists have made provably false statements to Congress, produced “documentaries” that were found to be propaganda, manipulated data, quantified those lies in computer models, and those models provide undeniable evidence of bias, incompetence, scientific malpractice, and a defining moral bankruptcy and pervasive violation of scientific ethics on a biblical scale.

The absurdity that a group of “expert” slimate clientists can reach a 95% confidence level of certainty, based upon computer models that reject the theory at a 95% confidence level proves scientifically that this isn’t a real science. If something is understood, it can be modeled. The IPCC models prove at the 95% confidence level that the existing CO2 AGW theory is rejected when the scientific method is applied. The very fact that ALL of the models failed proves a universal bias that infests almost the entire field of slimate clience, and certainly 100% of the IPCC hand-picked “experts.”

With the globe likely headed for a cooling phase, and the focus on warming leaving society unprepared for the real threat of cooling, it is time for America and the World to start holding our leaders accountable and remove politics from science. Just as the Iranians appear to have reached the “tipping point” and are no longer willing to accept lies and corruption from their leaders, it is the time for the rest of the world to join them and demand the lies and corruption be driven out of the politics of slimate clience. There are simply far far far more pressing and real problems for our public money to be spent on.

Please Like, Share, Subscribe and Comment. To Share, simply click a button below. Be sure to share on facebook to “trigger” some alarmists.


Universities face #MeToo movement over sexual harassment

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Academia — like Hollywood, the media and Congress — is facing its own #MeToo movement over allegations of sexual misconduct. Brett Sokolow, who heads an association of sexual harassment investigators on campuses, estimates that the number of reported complaints has risen by about 10 percent since the accusations against Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein surfaced in early October, spurring more women to speak out against harassment in various fields. The increase is mostly from women complaining of harassment by faculty members who are their superiors.

A forthcoming study of nearly 300 such cases in the Utah Law Review found that one in 10 female graduate students at major research universities reports being sexually harassed by a faculty member. And in more than half of those cases, the alleged perpetrator is a repeat offender, according to the study.

Read More: Universities face #MeToo movement over sexual harassment

Harassment in Climate Science: Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry Retires from Academia, Here’s Why!

Related: I Am Woman Hear Me Roar; Michael Mann’s Bullying Backfires 

Over Harassment results in Resignation: Dr. Judith Curry describes Harassment at the Universities

Please Like, Share, Subscribe and Comment