Something Progressives don’t seem to understand or willing to accept is that science isn’t politically correct. In science there are no safe spaces, isn’t “fair,” doesn’t have feelings and certainly doesn’t give a damn about the feelings of snowflakes. Violating the scientific method and denying the facts and results of experiments won’t change the reality of the situation. Science is the unbiased thirst for knowledge. Science isn’t a Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, science is an unbiased process that is highly useful in providing answers and solutions to many of today’s greatest problems.
Unfortunately, science isn’t a friend of the Progressive agenda. Socialism didn’t save oil and natural resource-rich Venezuela, Cuba or Russia. Only the “adjusted” ground temperature measurements support their hysterical CAGW claims, welfare didn’t end poverty, Obama sized Government Debt/Spending, zero interest rates, and crippling regulations didn’t restore economic growth, and government-run Inner-City schools aren’t the answer to improving the lives of impoverished blacks. Wind and solar are complete jokes as far as alternative energy sources, and the only reason average people bought electric cars is because the government paid them to do so.
With such as a catastrophic and extensive record of complete and utter failure, the Progressives’ only political strategy is to prevent people from looking behind the curtain and attack those who do. Slimate Clience isn’t the only field of science corrupted by the progressive political agenda, almost every field in Social “Science” has. A recent high school science fair project and the hysterical response by the progressives demonstrates just how pervasive this cancer truly is. An Asian student at a wealthy elite presumably mostly white magnet school dared to ask the forbidden question “are their differences between the races.” Gasp!!! The horror of it!!!! Someone dared to ask a normal question highly worthy of scientific exploration.
The fact that there are extreme differences between the sexes, races, and even between the respective sub-groups is well known in the medical field. Every medical history starts with Age, Sex, Race, and even sexual orientation. Is that because the doctor sitting across from you is a racist, sexist homophobe? Nope, it is because medical diseases occur at differing prevalences based on those factors. Men don’t get ovarian cancer, White people don’t get cycle-cell anemia, Women don’t get prostate cancer, Blacks rarely get melanoma, Christians don’t get Tay-Sachs disease. The medical books are full of diseases that have wide differentials between the various groups of people. The infinite diversity of humanity demands infinite differences.
The Progressive’s anti-science politically correct position that all human beings are equal and that the only differences are due to nurture and not nature demonstrates an absolute ignorance of evolution, biology, physiology, genetics, geography, and sociology. The first Hominin appeared about 3 million years ago, somewhere in the African grasslands. 200,000 years ago the first Homo sapiens appear in the geological record. Then about 70,000 years ago, Humans began to migrate out of Africa. Over that 70,000 years, humans evolved into countless different races shaped by their environment.
For the Progressives to be correct, the only changes 70,000 years of evolution has had on the human species are exclusively physical and none impacted the brain. The missing branch/chromatid of chromosome 23, the branch/chromatid that determines sex, exclusively impacts physical traits, and no genes on that branch/chromatid impact the brain. This position is absurd on its face, yet it is the basis for almost all of the Progressive political philosophy. Remember, the missing branch/chromatid determines sexual behavior and drive, both of which are mental, not physical, so we know there are some changes to the brain.
Anyone that has ever raised a child, and observed them on a pre-school playground knows that there are infinite mental and behavioral differences inherent in the sexes. Girls are far more social and develop verbal skills way before the boys. Rarely do you see little girls get into fist fights, wrestle or take pride in passing gas in their friend’s face. Girls tend to group together, cooperate, talk a whole lot, and watch in complete confusion as to why boys do what they do. Boys can’t figure out the girls either, and can’t understand why the girls don’t think jumping off a roof and flying like Superman isn’t the coolest thing in the world. The girls’ apparent enjoyment of endlessly talking and complete disinterest in physical altercations and playing soldier is completely foreign to the little boys. Later on in life, the boys will never understand why the girls don’t want to take advantage of every opportunity to have sex. That is a mystery they will never understand.
Researchers have long agreed girls have superior language abilities to boys, but haven’t clearly provided a biological basis to account for their differences. For the first time and in unambiguous findings, researchers show both that brain areas associated with language work harder in girls during language tasks, and that boys and girls rely on very different parts of the brain when performing these tasks. Language processing is more abstract in girls, more sensory in boys.
There is absolutely no reason that 70,000 years the evolutionary forces would only impact physical characteristics. Small group tribal Bushmen in Africa are naturally selected for their ability to hunt and gather is a grassland environment, women are selected for their ability to raise their children to sexual maturity. Both sexes rely on completely different physical and mental abilities to perpetuate the species. Chatterbox hunters attract predators and get eaten, mothers that aren’t continually communicating with their children have fewer offspring reaching the critical sexual maturity. Evolution had no need for men that behaved like women, and women that behaved like men. That is why men and women were created, they each serve a totally different evolutionary function. Only when Progressives begin to judge and apply relative values to these functions does this become a problem. According to Progressives, Mother Nature is wrong, and they are right.
Evolution has resulted in some extreme intra-race differences. Northerners are so far removed from their African ancestors that their skin has lost much of its ability to produce protective melanin in order to better produce vitamin-D. Northerners, however, faced wildly different evolutionary forces. Germans in the dense forests of Europe were selected for their ability to build homes and cities out of the unforgiving wilderness, challenges never faced by the Bushmen of Africa. Engineering and industriousness were heavily rewarded. Women were attracted to the builders, not the hunters because their home and survival depended upon it. The societies of ancient Mesopotamia and the Mediterranean were urban, and natural selection focused more on farming, trading, and politics. Traits required to succeed in a highly structured society are extremely different from those of the Bushmen. Trying to catch the attention of an ancient wealthy Greek woman with a dead goat wouldn’t succeed, but offer her a gold coin, neckless or ring and you get a second date. There were no ancient great cities, naval fleets, markets or populous civilizations in sub-Saharan Africa. The groups evolved completely different, both physically, socially and mentally.
It is because of those obvious evolutionary forces that the differences between the sexes and races should be studied. I am a conservative white male, part of the “privileged” race and sex, so I have no incentive to distort science to gain a political and social advantage. But what if I wasn’t? What if the Progressives didn’t define the white heterosexual male as the ideal, but instead determined homosexual Asian females as the ideal. I would be exposed to constant social pressure encouraging me to sleep with men and pursue jobs and hobbies that would make me suicidal. Because Progressives don’t encourage minorities and women to celebrate who they are, it is understandable why the Progressives that buy into their equality ideology are so miserable and demonstrate such destructive self-hate. Progressive followers are simply seeking someone else’s vision of what they should be. Who made Progressives the final arbiter of what race and sex are the ideals? There are a lot of drawbacks to being White Males, for one, you have to tolerate endless childish attacks by the Progressives.
Just as I would hate to have society pressuring me to be a homosexual Asian woman, women must hate being pressured to become engineers and mathematicians, and blacks must hate to be pressured to enter fields that they don’t have an aptitude for as well. The digital revolution has largely occurred post the 1960’s sexual and civil rights revolution. Women and Blacks had an equal opportunity to get into computer programming and coding, we were all here during the birth of this nascent industry, yet it was white men that created and succeeded in the industry. Women and blacks could have created a computer or software programs, but they didn’t. There are no real barriers to entry to that industry, but White Men seem to naturally dominate in it. There is no way parents in the 1960s were encouraging their boys to become Java programmers because there was no Java. You can’t blame racism and sexism because consumers don’t know who coded the program, and anyone can upload an App for sale in the Google App Store. Color and sex blind consumers determine who succeeds and who doesn’t.
Why is this important? Let’s assume that blacks and women do have different mental aptitudes than white males. If you were black or a female, wouldn’t you want to know what they were? Shouldn’t we be helping people reach their potentials by identifying their strengths and weaknesses, not treating them as homogenized pawns in some counterproductive and divisive political game? Once again, if I was being told I should be homosexual and work in a job contrary to my interests and aptitudes, I’d be suicidal. Begin a white male does have huge advantages, my life has never been shaped by the insane self-hate generating positions of the Progressives. I do what I want and I work in the field that I want 100% because I was drawn to it. I am extremely thankful for that, and I can only hope that others get to live a life of such freedom and self-actualization.
Lastly, do the math. There is a reason we don’t want our women to be manning the front lines of a battlefield. 1 man and 100 women can easily keep the species alive. 100 men and 1 women and the species become extinct. When it comes to evolution men and women aren’t equal, not even close. Women are essential, men are expendable, in fact, the female of some species actually kills and eats the male after mating. The Progressive ideology of “equality” literally threatens the survival of the species if global war ever breaks out. Societies that lose a large percent of childbearing age women become extinct. Men retain their ability to reproduce until the day they die. There is nothing equal about the role men and women play in evolution.
Another Perspective: John McWhorter argues that Progressive policies are what are holding Blacks back, not racism as claimed by the Progressives
Here is another idea: Rachel Weisz Rejects Female James Bond: Women Should ‘Get Their Own Stories’ “Why not create your own story”
Please Like, Share, Subscribe and Comment